Accepted octave-symbolic 2.0.0-1 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:01:15 -0200
Source: octave-symbolic
Binary: octave-symbolic
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net>
Description:
octave-symbolic - symbolic package for Octave
Changes:
octave-symbolic (2.0.0-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Imported Upstream version 2.0.0
* Remove obsolete patches:
+ d/p/avoid-ex-type-in-assert.patch
+ d/p/cell-as-retval-in-findsymbols.patch
+ d/p/fix-symfsolve-test.patch
+ d/p/fix-tests-blocks.patch
+ d/p/proper-cell-array-reversal.patch
+ d/p/store-symbolic-expressions.patch
+ d/p/sumterms-return-cell-vector.patch
* Build-depend and depend on python-sympy
* Prevent automatic running of tests in file sympref.m.
For that to work, Build-Dependency on octave-pkg-dev is set to
>= 1.2.0.
* Drop obsolete file d/octave-symbolic.docs
Checksums-Sha1:
7d1c6ede30025d00ed8ae05f7cb81e4943421ef0 2079 octave-symbolic_2.0.0-1.dsc
7946e7f0efd9bfea82adb0fffb5f1fdf3e2b4ab6 158854 octave-symbolic_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
83b6a0e68022b6679988a0427e4b26f35ea9065f 3336 octave-symbolic_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
4df039d1a8489426110f56ca00d3bbc8107b5a34caa1f451246c2d43bf118eca 2079 octave-symbolic_2.0.0-1.dsc
3566d7bea32f057ce9579af91cddebe4427b57594c1b1513b4038f47dfa73c44 158854 octave-symbolic_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
b0996e2ab95bc939294f006ac21d36754a3ed47331f9039e3c17e47505ecea32 3336 octave-symbolic_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
8e6c1d8c0332b4f86c1e0f16d5f1bff5 2079 math optional octave-symbolic_2.0.0-1.dsc
e7b4a8c37ac175029c25bceacd3641ff 158854 math optional octave-symbolic_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz
35e14a619cb2e07a7f42ddb70a9fef51 3336 math optional octave-symbolic_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=9nau
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: