Accepted r-bioc-rtracklayer 1.26.0-1 (source amd64) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:34:34 +0200
Source: r-bioc-rtracklayer
Binary: r-bioc-rtracklayer
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.26.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Description:
r-bioc-rtracklayer - GNU R interface to genome browsers and their annotation tracks
Changes:
r-bioc-rtracklayer (1.26.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version
+ cme fix dpkg-control
Checksums-Sha1:
f9592e0840e8acb547787fd311598ceed9cc345b 2178 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1.dsc
fc7c347e81420e4863b88e74cb0e651f02d26488 1338654 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0.orig.tar.gz
c09136a6e255b9ba1f0b0b3e4affbe01d010fefa 4540 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1.debian.tar.xz
36af99e3d9943069f035cfb8702c071eed3d6bdf 1780654 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
778657f4283829f5f9adb5f4b4f7dfdde31dbdf76783f1033456722436eb576b 2178 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1.dsc
b8deadeb1b0cf4be86b16fe6c7b4157af72973f85ce334c1652bcba1dadfe34d 1338654 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0.orig.tar.gz
43035681148e37222cb5ee84456b201801e71a013fbab2a82321c805b0cc2a61 4540 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1.debian.tar.xz
7c5791ef38e40936489ce096ef4a4c31aaf4eaf9197e76fd1623733a1ee17db5 1780654 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1_amd64.deb
Files:
a6e95a36ed66c5f66e92dcd9aa206910 2178 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1.dsc
fc7ed1800ca87009e3f597715197d3b0 1338654 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0.orig.tar.gz
53ccff6078809328820603fd462d4770 4540 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1.debian.tar.xz
121c8cd0ff3f94ac99373ed89e5b96d4 1780654 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.26.0-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=UTJi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: