[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: we'll have a booth \o/ (was: Re: Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 12 and 13 november 2016: T-DOSE 11th edition)



FWIW: De eerste x dat er een Debian booth was, was in 2007 :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-events-nl/2007/06/msg00000.html .  Ik geloof
dat t deze keer dus de 10e editie wordt van de Debian booth op T-DOSE.

Tot dan, Groeten,

Joost

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 07:10:51AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [usual suspects sebastic, paul vd v, anne and stappers Bcc'd]
> 
> There'll be a Debian booth at this year's T-DOSE conference again.  We need
> booth personel + goodies.  If you're interested in helping out, you're invited
> to leave a note at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/nl/2016/T-DOSE .
> 
> C U all in Eindhoven, 3 months from now!
> 
> Bye,
> 
> Joost
> 
> 
> PS: Posted on: 4 January 2016 By: jpsaman
> Every year in January the organisation for the next T-DOSE edition is starting.
> The team usually meets every month to determine which actions to take for next
> month. Therefore dividing the organisational work in small chunks. Every year
> we congest the feedback of last T-DOSE and formulate improvements to make. This
> year we wish to improve our communication and promotion activities. However the
> current team cannot do that alone, we need your help!. Do you have marketing
> and communication skills and are passionate about using open source and am
> willing to help organizing? If so, then please contact us at
> https://www.t-dose.org/contact.              --http://www.t-dose.org/node/948
> 
> PPS: If you'd like to give a talk, there's still time to apply: CfP ends
> September 30, 2016.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:29:11AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > 
> > The T-DOSE 2016 Open Source conference is on 12 and 13th of November in
> > building R5 at the Fontys University of applied science in Eindhoven, The
> > Netherlands.  For visitors, no registration is needed and entrance is gratis.
> <snip>
> 



Reply to: