Hi, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I've taken a look at the OOo stuff last night. > The following packages fit on a 700MB version of the image > (from the vpnjunkies archiv) > > openoffice.org1.1-help-en_1.1beta2-2_all.deb 1.1 help for 1.0.3 package? > openoffice.org-bin_1.0.3-2_i386.deb use 0woody2. Thats the backport.... > openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.0.3-2_all.deb > openoffice.org1.1-l10n-de_1.1beta2-2_all.deb See as above. > openoffice.org-debian-files_1.0.3-2+1_all.deb > openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de_20020701-3_all.deb old version... Take the one from sarge/sid.... (This version has much bugs....) Shouldn't we add -de-at, -de-ch if we include de. LinuxTag isn't .de centric is it? ;-) (the same about version applies for them too) > The only problem is that they've some non woody dependencies. > sven@marvin:/mnt/data/debcd/svenadd/OOo$ dpkg -I openoffice.org-bin_1.0.3-2_i386.deb Sure. Because you didn't take the backport but the sarge/sid version.. > The bunk package looks a little bit better > sven@marvin:/tmp$ dpkg -I openoffice.org-bin_1.0.3-1.bunk_i386.deb > Architecture: i386 > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libfreetype6 (<< 2.1.0), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.2-0.bunk), libstdc++3 (>= 1:3.0.3-1), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.2-0.bunk), libxaw7 (>> 4.1.0), xlibs (>> 4.1.0), openoffice.org (>= 1.0.2-pre1.0.3) Which needs backported versions of gcc and the whole sh* (libstdc++5 from Adrian) > Hints and suggestions from the people who would like to have > OOo included? Take the backport. use 1.0.3 packages (and not a mix from 1.0.3 and 1.1 and everything is OK..) Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
pgpl0XniSDQnU.pgp
Description: PGP signature