Re: Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?

To: debian-embedded <debian-embedded@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?
From: Jim Heck <pinball.rules@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:15:57 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTi=nVNPLXRAuF4E_BpRE2y4ChJ++0wNEL5ZEGbrd@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTinYveYd3pvPTsqmS5_Ch=x38EHC=BpNPpZdStMZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] AANLkTinYveYd3pvPTsqmS5_Ch=x38EHC=BpNPpZdStMZ@mail.gmail.com>

In case it mattered (which I highly doubt), I'm using the experimental version of binutils (2.20.51.20100908-1).

Also, just wondering, is it likely that this experimental version will be adopted before squeeze is finalized? I ask, since that is the version I had my prefix and static patches incorporated into.

Thanks,

-Jim

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?
  - From: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>

References:
- Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?
  - From: Jim Heck <pinball.rules@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?
Next by Date: Re: Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?
Previous by thread: Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?
Next by thread: Re: Does this dh_link failure cross building gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14) look familiar to anyone?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread