Biarch vs Multiarch
Hi,
I'm (again) working on the uClibc package, and am unsure on some design
decisions:
- in dpkg, there are "uclibc-linux-<cpu>" architectures. If uClibc were
to use these, this would mean that the only "binary" package created
would be "uclibc-source".
The alternative would be to do the same thing as the "other"
alternative C libraries and provide a runtime library package that is
co-installable with eglibc, and a -dev package that is co-installable
but requires special compiler flags to be activated.
- There are no 64 bit equivalents for powerpc, sparc, s390 and
mips(el). If I want to support 64 bit processes on these systems, I'd
either need to use a newly created architecture, or create biarch
packages, which I believe multiarch should supersede. As this is a
general problem for all libraries, I wonder what is going to be
Debian's policy in that matter -- are there plans to introduce
partial arches for these, and if so, before or after squeeze?
Do you have any preferences on these two points?
Simon
Reply to: