On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:57 +0000, David Goodenough wrote: > This question really raises two questions. > > dnsmasq is a useful little utility, rather as busybox is useful, in that is > contains lots of functions in one (relatively) small package. It might be > worth considering using it rather than udhcpd. In particular it is also > a dnsproxy. Cross build and you can use it. To replace udhcpd, copy the suite script, drop the package and replace what you want then specify that suite script in packages.conf. > > The second question concerns the way in which a machine (or variant) tailors > the list of packages to be included. In particular OpenWrt has the notion > that you can both add and subtract packages from the base list. Thus in this > case packages.conf would contain (assuming basefiles was as currently setup) > > INCLUDE=-udhcpd,dnsmasq > > which would have the effect of removing udhcpd from the list, and adding > dnsmasq. An alternative would to introduce an EXCLUDE= line. Yes, I'll look at implementing that. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part