Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:46:55 +0100 with message-id <20070814144655.f04e2a2b.codehelp@debian.org> and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: dpkg-cross: should read both site-wide and user-specific config file
- From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:09:11 +0200
- Message-id: <200607241309.k6OD9BDo013227@kakmonster.int.dactylis.com>
Package: dpkg-cross Version: 1.29 Severity: minor If the user has a ~/.dpkg-cross/cross-compile, the site-wide file /etc/dpkg-cross/cross-compile is ignored. It would be more useful if the settings in the user-defined file were added to the site-wide defaults. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages dpkg-cross depends on: ii binutils 2.17-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii dpkg-dev 1.13.21 package building tools for Debian ii file 4.17-2 Determines file type using "magic" dpkg-cross recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 379597-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Closing
- From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:46:55 +0100
- Message-id: <20070814144655.f04e2a2b.codehelp@debian.org>
In the absence of any reason to think that the two methods proposed would not be sufficient to solve the original problem, I'm closing this bug. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/Attachment: pgpCe7WUwnCeU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---