Regarding the remaining differences between the %archtable in dpkg-cross and the values from dpkg-architecture, how easy would it be to migrate completely to the dpkg-architecture list? With Ron's changes from #430507, the remaining issues are: %archtable = ( 'armeb' => 'armeb-linux-gnueabi', #XXX This differs from dpkg-architecture 'hurd-i386' => 'i386-gnu', #XXX This differs from dpkg-architecture 's390x' => 's390-linux-gnu', #XXX This differs from dpkg-architecture 'openbsd-i386' => 'i386-openbsd', #XXX This differs from dpkg-architecture 'freebsd-i386' => 'i386-freebsd', #XXX This differs from dpkg-architecture 'darwin-i386' => 'i386-darwin', #XXX This differs from dpkg-architecture 'win32-i386' => 'i386-cygwin' ); dpkg-architecture values: armeb => armeb-linux-gnu hurd-i386 => i486-gnu s390x => s390x-linux-gnu openbsd-i386 => i486-openbsd freebas-i386 => i486-freebsd darwinbsd-i386 is unknown win32-i386 is unknown Can dpkg-cross 2.0.0 migrate wholesale to the dpkg-architecture values? Do we drop the unknown values or retain them? I expect the dpkg-buildpackage and dpkg-shlibdeps diversions to be removable in dpkg-cross 2.x and I am working with the dpkg developers to achieve this. I would expect this to require a closer tie in with dpkg-architecture such that %archtable is completely removed. Yes? (So far, I am planning on migrating the dpkg-cross versions of dpkg-buildpackage and dpkg-shlibdeps into /usr/share/dpkg-cross/ once the standard dpkg-dev versions include the necessary support, dropping the diversions in the process.) BTW: apologies - my internet connection has become exceptionally brittle (I suspect a signal:noise problem on the line) so I cannot connect to IRC for longer than a few seconds and sending/receiving email is temperamental. Please don't think I'm ignoring you if I don't appear to respond at the moment. Unless the problem resolves spontaneously, I see little prospect of the problem being fixed over this holiday weekend. I will continue working on the code at this end but CVS/SVN commits may be impaired. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpPz675haQwU.pgp
Description: PGP signature