[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg-architecture adaptations for e.g. uclibc

2006/6/12, Volker Grabsch <vog@notjusthosting.com>:
In the
long run that would mean adding "i486", "i586", "i686", "k6", ...
to the cputable, which surely isn't desireable, is it?

Sounds good to me, shouls someone want to build/make available a, say,
i686 repo.
It retroactively applies the multiple arm cpu variant logic to the x86 family.


Reply to: