Re: ELUG

[Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>]

Jon Masters wrote:
> Justin Cormack wrote:
>
> | hmm, even embeddedtux is basically for a distribution, not general
> | purpose. 

And what distribution would that be?

> c.o.s.l.embedded as more general.
>
> My point was that after looking and some limited external participation
> from others it seemed that there was not such a group already.

What's wrong with comp.os.linux.embedded?  It's perfectly general.
Archives are online at http://groups.google.com/groups?group=comp.os.linux.embedded

Oh, you don't like newsgroups?  OK, how about the linux-embedded mailing list,
http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=linux-embedded
also online as http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded/ ?

There are probably several others.  The last thing we need is yet another.

> I put forward the suggestion and some have already joined so perhaps we
> can give it a go and see what happens next.

Learn to use Google, why don't you...
- Dan

--
US citizens: if you're considering voting for Bush, look at these first:
http://www.misleader.org/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/arar/
http://www.house.gov/reform/min/politicsandscience/