Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: >> From: Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org >> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:37:53 -0800 >> >> > By how much do you need to enlarge to make the builds succeed? >> > >> >> FTR in the log of Debian armhf buildd[1] there is a line says: >> >> ,---- >> | emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 4546239 bytes needed) >> `---- >> >> I tested that increasing the base value to 4500000 worked on i386 (patch >> attached). Also tested that 4M was not large enough. Sean is also >> testing 45 * 1024 * 1024 on 32-bit arm* buildds. > > Is this the smallest number that works? E.g., does 4000000 also work > or does it fail? > 4000000 failed. I think 4.5M is a good number and close to the error suggested required size. >> Though 4.5M is probably sufficient for now, I wonder whether it's >> acceptable to further increase this to 5000000 to be more future proof? > > We didn't yet have enough complaints about puresize to justify that. > >> On the other hand, I see there are threads on emacs-devel talking about >> removing pure space. Is that referring to this pure lisp storage? > > Yes, we recently removed pure space on master. Ah good to know. Thanks! -- Regards, Xiyue Deng
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature