[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1033697: flycheck: autopkgtest fails: trampoline file does not exists



Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> writes:

> Source: flycheck
> Version: 32~git.20200527.9c435db3-3
> Severity: serious
[snip]
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>    spy-on(buffer-file-name :and-return-value "test-buffer-name")
>    buttercup--spy-on-and-call-replacement(buffer-file-name (lambda 
> (&rest arg...
>    comp-subr-trampoline-install(buffer-file-name)
>    comp-trampoline-search(buffer-file-name)
>  
> native-elisp-load("/home/debci/.emacs.d/eln-cache/28.2-ffd0c654/subr--tram...
> error: (native-lisp-load-failed "file does not exists" 
> "/home/debci/.emacs.d/eln-cache/28.2-ffd0c654/subr--trampoline-6275666665722d66696c652d6e616d65_buffer_file_name_0.eln")
>
> ========================================
> [31mUtilities flycheck-buffer-saved-p considers a modified buffer with 
> backing file unsaved[0m
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>    spy-on(buffer-file-name :and-return-value "test-buffer-name")
>    buttercup--spy-on-and-call-replacement(buffer-file-name (lambda 
> (&rest arg...
>    comp-subr-trampoline-install(buffer-file-name)
>    comp-trampoline-search(buffer-file-name)
>  
> native-elisp-load("/home/debci/.emacs.d/eln-cache/28.2-ffd0c654/subr--tram...
> error: (native-lisp-load-failed "file does not exists" 
> "/home/debci/.emacs.d/eln-cache/28.2-ffd0c654/subr--trampoline-6275666665722d66696c652d6e616d65_buffer_file_name_0.eln")
>
> Ran 109 out of 110 specs, 2 failed, in 389.98ms.

I wonder if the following upstream Emacs bug (tldr: given two
primitives, the necessary trampoline and eln file is not generated for
the second primitive) is the cause of this behaviour?:

  https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2023-02/msg02464.html

Rob, Sean, and Aymeric, what do you think?  To my eyes that upstream
Emacs bug looks like it's probably RC buggy, and flycheck+buttercup is a
reproducer.

Regards,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: