[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1016783: emacs-pdf-tools: switch to new fork?



Source: emacs-pdf-tools
Version: 1.0~20200512-2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

According to the current upstream,

          PDF Tools is dead, long live PDF Tools. Development
          continues with this fork:
          https://github.com/vedang/pdf-tools .

There is a tag 0.91 on that repo that seems newer than what we have.

unfortunately someone (me?) chose 1.0~date as version scheme for the
existing package, so that's a mess that would need to be cleaned up.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=VnXb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: