Bug#1012753: RFA: geiser -- enhanced Scheme interaction mode for Emacs
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:geiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I request an adopter for the geiser package.
I am not using the package any more, and consequently doing a bad job
of maintaining it. The package is currently maintained under the
umbrella of the emacsen team [1] and the adopter should either join
the team or remove the team as maintainer.
The package description is:
Geiser features an enhanced REPL and a set of minor modes improving
Emacs' basic scheme major mode. The main functionalities provided
are:
- Evaluation of forms in the namespace of the current module.
- Macro expansion.
- File/module loading.
- Namespace-aware identifier completion (including local bindings,
names visible in the current module, and module names).
- Autodoc: the echo area shows information about the signature of
the procedure/macro around point automatically.
- Jump to definition of identifier at point.
- Access to documentation (including docstrings when the
implementation provides it).
- Listings of identifiers exported by a given module.
- Listings of callers/callees of procedures.
- Rudimentary support for debugging (list of
evaluation/compilation error in an Emacs' compilation-mode
buffer).
[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianEmacsenTeam
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=WtlI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: