Bug#980538: marked as done (elpa-company should recommend clang)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:34:37 +0000
with message-id <E1l2emz-000Crp-IS@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#980538: fixed in company-mode 0.9.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #980538,
regarding elpa-company should recommend clang
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
980538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: elpa-company
Version: 0.9.13-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
If elpa-company is installed on a system where clang is not available, starting company-mode fails with
Company backend ’company-clang’ could not be initialized:
Company found no clang executable
I believe it would be helpful if the package would recommend the clang
package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages elpa-company depends on:
ii dh-elpa-helper 2.0.6
ii emacsen-common 3.0.4
elpa-company recommends no packages.
elpa-company suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: company-mode
Source-Version: 0.9.13-2
Done: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
company-mode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 980538@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> (supplier of updated company-mode package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:06:43 -0400
Source: company-mode
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacsen Team <debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Closes: 980538
Changes:
company-mode (0.9.13-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Suggest clang for company-clang (C/C++) backend. Thanks to Gard
Spreemann (Closes: #980538).
Checksums-Sha1:
346036f72e0ebcb51515947e58ede2445114a27b 2077 company-mode_0.9.13-2.dsc
e3ea4e6bd85874dff6c69a20838f8a68b4ebdde4 2896 company-mode_0.9.13-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
0cd11d168cde6b0c4cac4ce5ddb0bda69d4f5572f600d08c22218f945fa6afda 2077 company-mode_0.9.13-2.dsc
9a492e3219a6f8c8d01433ea6f5cb735e28313e6b90c05453a28bc08042f56ad 2896 company-mode_0.9.13-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
e6b2e171b40ecafcf64f3b3f432dc1d4 2077 lisp optional company-mode_0.9.13-2.dsc
a2642a0a381c32ca900c3e03a5ee5425 2896 lisp optional company-mode_0.9.13-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=O7Lc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: