--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: dh-elpa: please support tuning which emacs flavors to skip
- From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 15:10:46 -0400
- Message-id: <150083704613.16108.8498762018393925310.reportbug@ghostwheel.internal.ucko.debian.net>
Package: dh-elpa
Version: 1.8
Severity: normal
dh-elpa supplies emacsen-common install and remove scripts that
hardcode the list of emacs flavors to skip as obsolete (GNU Emacs 23
and below) or simply unsupported (XEmacs). This one-size-fits-all
approach has two drawbacks:
- It does not fully accommodate packages that have retained
compatibility with some or all of the skipped flavors.
- It forces packages that are compatible only with Emacs 25 to
declare outright conflicts with Emacs 24, rather than simply
skipping byte-compilation for it.
I find the latter particularly concerning, because the former is
easier to work around. (Yes, I do prefer Emacs 25 myself, but I keep
a full range of Emacs flavors installed for compatibility testing.)
Please give packages an opportunity to tune the set of flavors to
skip, and then use this feature to retire elpa-apiwrap's,
elpa-ghub(+)'s, and elpa-magithub's conflicts with Emacs 24.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, x32
Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages dh-elpa depends on:
ii debhelper 10.2.5
ii dh-make-perl 0.95
ii emacs24 24.5+1-11
ii emacs25 25.2+1-1
ii libarray-utils-perl 0.5-1
ii libconfig-tiny-perl 2.23-1
ii libdebian-source-perl 0.95
ii libdpkg-perl 1.18.24
ii libfile-find-rule-perl 0.34-1
ii libtext-glob-perl 0.10-1
ii perl 5.24.1-7
dh-elpa recommends no packages.
dh-elpa suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
- Cc: 869509-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#869509: Is this bug still relevant?
- From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:53:47 -0300
- Message-id: <87o8zl8vb8.fsf@tethera.net>
- In-reply-to: <udlwoeauzvy.fsf@mit.edu>
- References: <150083704613.16108.8498762018393925310.reportbug@ghostwheel.internal.ucko.debian.net> <87lfuryp7a.fsf@tethera.net> <udlwoeauzvy.fsf@mit.edu>
ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
>
>> Now that GNU Emacs in Debian stable is unversioned, and most of the
>> flavours have gone away, I wonder if there is anything to do here?
>
> Not at this point, thanks.
Thanks for getting back to me. Let's close it for now.
d
--- End Message ---