Re: Updating use-package, Version and Package-Version mess
Пт 21 дек 2018 @ 12:15 Sean Whitton <email@example.com>:
> On Wed 05 Dec 2018 at 01:14pm +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
>> So, sticking to stable MELPA version will not require splitting the
>> source code into several source packages.
>> Should I patch Version (change it everywhere to 2.4) or include
>> Package-Version (as it is done in MELPA)?
> From the user point of view, I don't think there is any difference
> between doing these two things. Package-Version and Version are
> semantically equivalent except the former overrides the latter if both
> are present.
> Was this the only question that you had?
Yes, that's the only thing I wanted to discuss. Thanks for your input!
I'd stick to MELPA process, that is I plan to add Package-Version in the
very same way. I'll proceed with the update in the next few days.