[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-emacsen-addons] Bug#911553: RFS: rtags/2.20-1 [ITP]


On Fri 26 Oct 2018 at 11:08PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:

>> It builds those binary packages:
>> elpa-ac-rtags - auto-complete back-end for RTags
>> elpa-company-rtags - company back-end for RTags
>> elpa-flycheck-rtags - flycheck integration for RTags
>> elpa-helm-rtags - helm interface for RTags
>> elpa-ivy-rtags - ivy back-end for RTags
>> elpa-rtags - emacs front-end for RTags
>> rtags - C/C++ client/server indexer with integration for Emacs
> Normally I'm in favour of each upstream elpa package being a debian
> binary package, but I wonder if these needs (initially) to generate so
> many binary packages.  elpa-rtags makes sense as a binary package, since
> at least one other package in melpa (malinka) depends on it. The others
> might be groupable into one binary package. I'm not sure if that would
> introduce significate maintenance overhead.

If we don't use the separate binary packages, ${elpa:Depends} won't work
properly.  This might create more work for maintainers.

Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: