Re: Sponsor for my packages needed

[Miles Bader <miles.bader@necel.com>]

Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org> writes:
>  - erc (will need to remove manual)
>  - emms (talked with the former package maintainer and gained consent
>    to maintain this -- will need to remove manual)
>  - muse-el (already removed manual)
>  - planner-el (manual is GPL'd)
>  - remember-el  (will need to remove manual)

How come some packages end in "-el", but not others?  I presume the
ones ending in "-el" are written in elisp, and I know "erc" is...

Hmm looking at apt-cache output, there doesn't seem much in the way of
naming consistency among extension packages for emacs -- many end in
"-el", some in "-elisp", some in "-emacs", many (perhaps most) have no
suffix.

-Miles

-- 
Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down.