Re: Gnus Manual License

[David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>]

James Troup <james@nocrew.org> writes:

> Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org> writes:
>
>> Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package?
>
> It has cover texts.  According to:
>
>   http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
>
> (Specifically:
>
> """This means that works that don't include any Invariant Sections,
>    Cover Texts, Acknowledgements, and Dedications (or that do, but
>    permission to remove them is explicitly granted), are suitable for the
>    main component of our distribution."""
> )
>
> that makes it unsuitable for main.

Uh, that is reverse logic.  The above explains what is _suitable_, not
what is _unsuitable_.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum