Hi, I'm maintaining zile, a small Emacs clone in terminal mode. It provides emacs key bindings, buffers and even a lisp config file. But of course it is lighter and do not aim at being a complete replacement for emacs. One of Zile users asked me to register zile as an alternative to emacs (#387164). What do you think of this ? What priority should I assign to zile if this alternative is acceptable ? Thanks, (Please, Cc me, I'm not subscribed to the list.) -- Nicolas Duboc <nduboc@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgppnUNSk8Rss.pgp
Description: PGP signature