On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:51:09PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: > Romain Francoise wrote : > > No offense, but I don't think anyone cares very much as long as zile > > doesn't get in the way of a real Emacs alternative. So just do whatever > > you feel is right. > > OK, so I will register zile as an alternative for emacs. I will use > priority 12 so as to be higher than e3 (zile is nearer to emacs > than e3em). I have changed my mind after reception of #398761 and #398858. Indeed, emacs is more than just a text editor. An emacs without elisp interpretation is not really an emacs. If people need emacs, they will install emacs and if they need a lighter emacs, they will search one and find and use zile or other similar editors. So I removed the emacs alternative in zile 2.2.22-3 (just uploaded). Robert, fill free to reopen #387164 if you are not convinced. But I do not intend to change my mind again, at least, not before etch release. Regards, -- Nicolas Duboc <nduboc@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgpnoHuUb8Tje.pgp
Description: PGP signature