Il giorno mer, 13/09/2006 alle 13.23 +0200, Florent Rougon ha scritto: > Elias Oltmanns <oltmanns@uni-bonn.de> wrote: > > > package gnus-doc in non-free be an appropriate solution? GNU stuff in > > non-free seems rather strange but would be funny anyway. > > There is already a bunch of GNU software in non-free: > - make-doc > - texinfo-doc-nonfree > - autoconf-doc > - automake.*-doc > - tar-doc > - glibc-doc-reference > - gnu-standards > ... And I would add "for the same reason". There has been some discussion lately about gnus, not from this point of view though, whereas there has been a _long_ dispute on GFDL, and that's the result. Anyway, I reckon shipping gnus-doc in non-free would be _the_ solution. You should take up some discussion on the matter ( perhaps starting from a bug report ( if there's not already one... ) ? ). Ciao ~marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente