Re: emacs.app_9.0pre2-1_i386.changes REJECTED
On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:43 AM, Henrik Enberg wrote:
Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here...
I would rather like useful comments than shit like that.
Here's a useful comment. Are you going to release an experimental
branch that's not considered stable enough to be in the Emacs trunk
as a stable program?
Well, the notion of "stable" is relative. We were looking by analogy
to the "emacs-snapshot' Debian package -- it's not based on a release
of GNU Emacs, but it's still a package. Among unreleased code, the
unicode-2 branch of emacs is considered less stable than CVS head, I
suppose, but it's open to debate where the line for Debian should be
drawn. Based on my own daily use of unicode-2, it's at least as
stable as Head was, say, a year or so ago (though maybe the Debian
snapshot package started more recently than that?), but I'm not sure
this is consistent with others' experience. And I know some people
have said that unicode-2 is a little slower than head..