Re: Some XEmacs issues and proposals
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:37:59 +0200, David Kastrup <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Now you have to ask yourself: for how many Emacs packages are there
> Debian versions maintained by upstream, the ideal constellation?
If by that you mean that there is ./debian directory upstream,
then by no means is it an ideal "constellation", unless constellation
is something negative. Indeed, fvwm hasa ./debian directory, but I
wipe it clean, and put in my own in its place; I would not expect
upstream to monitor and follow Debian policy and inter package
I would also much rather Gnus did not developer a native
./debian directory on its own either ;-)
The Phone Booth Rule: A lone dime always gets the number nearly right.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C