[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Some XEmacs issues and proposals

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:37:59 +0200, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> said: 

> Now you have to ask yourself: for how many Emacs packages are there
> Debian versions maintained by upstream, the ideal constellation?

        If by that you mean that there is ./debian directory upstream,
 then by no means is it an ideal "constellation", unless constellation
 is something negative.  Indeed, fvwm hasa ./debian directory, but I
 wipe it clean, and put in my own in its place; I would not expect
 upstream to monitor and follow Debian policy and inter package

        I would also much rather Gnus did not developer a native
 ./debian directory on its own either ;-)

The Phone Booth Rule: A lone dime always gets the number nearly right.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: