Re: New from emacs-snapshot
Quoting Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>:
> Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> writes:
>
> > Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> writes:
> >
> >>> Hmm, Daniel, I looked into Makefiles and I didn't find any reason
> >>> why it would be necessary. I think locallisppath is useless out
> >>> of epaths-force and install.
> >>
> >> Yes, as far as I know we only need it for those two targets. I put it
> >> there (i.e., in `build_cmd') because I figured it couldn't hurt and
> >> that's how emacs21 did it.
> >
> > OK. I removed it and commited your changes. Feel free to comment, as
> > usual :)
>
> I'm afraid you removed it a little too well. These lines
>
> ${build_cmd} epaths-force
>
> need to have locallisppath set (to the unprefixed directory names).
> I arranged for that by adding the
>
> locallisppath=${local_lpath}
Ahhhhhhh. Of course! There was a reason for it! I'll integrate
your changes.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
Reply to: