Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring
Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net> writes:
> Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)
> I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. They don't
> conflict. It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though.
Right, and dict.el has the advantage of being lighter-weight. I also
agree that it makes sense to merge the -extra package in to the main
one, treating individual files' dependencies as recommendations or
suggestions. (devscripts and xmms already work this way.)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger amu@monk.mit.edu (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
Reply to: