Re: w3 and Emacs 21 choices
Ben Pfaff <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> As the maintainer of Debian's w3 packages, I'm currently
> contemplating packaging w3 for Emacs 21, so that we'd have
> w3-el-e20 and w3-el-e21 packages. But there are several options.
> The viable choices I've come up with so far are as follows:
> 2a. w3-el-e20 would Depend: on `gnus'. This
> could potentially irritate people who don't
> want a newer version of Gnus.
I would wote for this.
> 2b. w3-el-e20 would be the same old w3, not from
> CVS. This would undoubtedly irritate people
> who wanted newer versions of w3.
I don't like this.
> 2c. We could have two packages for Emacs 20, one
> of 4.0pre.46, one of the CVS. I don't want
> to do this.
If not 2a, then 2c.
Keep up the good work, I'm a happy user of Emacs, Gnus and w3.