[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: Re: fwupd: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/testfile.c:17: undefined reference to `gcab_cabinet_add_allowed_compression'



Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 libflashrom-dev 1.3.0-2
Bug #1031448 [src:fwupd] fwupd: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/testfile.c:17: undefined reference to `gcab_cabinet_add_allowed_compression'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:fwupd' to 'libflashrom-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions fwupd/1.8.10-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1031448 to the same values previously set
Bug #1031448 [libflashrom-dev] fwupd: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/testfile.c:17: undefined reference to `gcab_cabinet_add_allowed_compression'
Marked as found in versions flashrom/1.3.0-2.
> affects -1 fwupd
Bug #1031448 [libflashrom-dev] fwupd: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/testfile.c:17: undefined reference to `gcab_cabinet_add_allowed_compression'
Added indication that 1031448 affects fwupd
> retitle -1 libfrashrom-dev missing dependency on pkg-config required libraries
Bug #1031448 [libflashrom-dev] fwupd: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/testfile.c:17: undefined reference to `gcab_cabinet_add_allowed_compression'
Changed Bug title to 'libfrashrom-dev missing dependency on pkg-config required libraries' from 'fwupd: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/meson-private/tmp7p7957mh/testfile.c:17: undefined reference to `gcab_cabinet_add_allowed_compression''.

-- 
1031448: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: