Hey folks, Upstream have split the UEFI bits of fwupd out into a new separate source package (fwupd-efi), and we're looking at updating to the new separated packages shortly. Normally this is a simple thing to do, and we can handle tha packaging changes just fine. However, I'm more worried about the effects on our SB signing setup. We'll be moving from the fwupd source package making the fwupd-ARCH-signed-template template package to a new setup. We're planning for the new fwupd-efi source package to take over the fwupd-ARCH-signed-template template package (and so on down the chain). However, I'm not sure that will work OK. Looking at config/debian/external-signatures.conf in DAK, will we be able to have two different source packages building the same binary like this (obviously targeting different releases!) ? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature