[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#950407: fwupd-refresh.service contains @bindir breaking the unit file



Package: fwupd
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

The recent update to 1.3.7-1 contains a broken
/lib/systemd/system/fwupd-refresh.service
as, what I guess must be a build system snafu, the unit file
contains:
ExecStart=@bindir@/fwupdmgr refresh --no-metadata-check
which doesn't work. Causes errors like
/lib/systemd/system/fwupd-refresh.service:17: Neither a valid executable name nor an absolute path: bindir@/fwupdmgr
which is a reasonable complaint.

Regards,

Andres

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.5.0-andres-06250-gfbcac2bd7a1f (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages fwupd depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.29-9
ii  libefiboot1            37-2
ii  libefivar1             37-2
ii  libelf1                0.176-1.1
ii  libfwupd2              1.3.7-1
ii  libfwupdplugin1        1.3.7-1
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.62.4-1+b1
ii  libgnutls30            3.6.11.1-2
ii  libgpg-error0          1.36-7
ii  libgpgme11             1.13.1-6
ii  libgudev-1.0-0         233-1
ii  libgusb2               0.3.0-1
ii  libjson-glib-1.0-0     1.4.4-2
ii  libpolkit-gobject-1-0  0.105-26
ii  libsmbios-c2           2.4.1-1
ii  libsoup2.4-1           2.68.2-1
ii  libsqlite3-0           3.31.0+really3.30.1+fossil191229-1
ii  libtss2-esys0          2.3.2-1
ii  libxmlb1               0.1.14-1
ii  shared-mime-info       1.10-1

Versions of packages fwupd recommends:
ii  bolt          0.8-4
pn  fwupd-signed  <none>
ii  python3       3.7.5-3

fwupd suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Reply to: