[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#945204: Incorrect unversioned dependency on libxmlb1

Package: fwupd
Version: 1.3.3-3
Severity: serious

The unversioned dependency on libxmlb1 is incorrect. On a partially upgraded
system it reports this at startup (all dependencies are satisfied):

fwupdmgr: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxmlb.so.1: version `LIBXMLB_0.1.7' not
found (required by fwupdmgr)
fwupdmgr: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxmlb.so.1: version `LIBXMLB_0.1.13' not
found (required by fwupdmgr)

This may also be a bug in libxmlb, depending on how the dependency is being
generated. I did not check, please reassign if needed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (90, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages fwupd depends on:
ii  libarchive13           3.3.3-4+deb10u1
ii  libc6                  2.29-2
ii  libefiboot1            37-2
ii  libefivar1             37-2
ii  libelf1                0.176-1.1
ii  libfwupd2              1.3.3-3
ii  libgcab-1.0-0          1.2-3~deb10u1
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.58.3-2+deb10u2
ii  libgnutls30            3.6.7-4
ii  libgpg-error0          1.35-1
ii  libgpgme11             1.12.0-6
ii  libgudev-1.0-0         232-2
ii  libgusb2               0.3.0-1
ii  libjson-glib-1.0-0     1.4.4-2
ii  libpolkit-gobject-1-0  0.105-25
ii  libsmbios-c2           2.4.1-1
ii  libsoup2.4-1           2.64.2-2
ii  libsqlite3-0           3.29.0-2
ii  libtss2-esys0          2.1.0-4
ii  libxmlb1               0.1.6-2
ii  shared-mime-info       1.10-1

Versions of packages fwupd recommends:
pn  bolt          <none>
pn  fwupd-signed  <none>
ii  python3       3.7.3-1

fwupd suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Reply to: