[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Review/Sponsor ITP for libxmlb



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Limonciello, Mario
> Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 10:24 AM
> To: steve@einval.com
> Cc: mak@debian.org; debian-efi@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Review/Sponsor ITP for libxmlb
> 
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 9:51 AM
> > To: Limonciello, Mario
> > Cc: mak@debian.org; debian-efi@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: Review/Sponsor ITP for libxmlb
> >
> >
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:46:18PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@dell.com wrote:
> > > From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
> > >>
> > >> As we're short of time to get this in for Buster, I've fixed up a few
> > >> things on the Debian branch, tagged, and uploaded. Fixes:
> > >>
> > >> f8dcc49 Medium urgency for upload
> > >> 369ff58 Update to a current Standards-Version
> > >> 5e5dbf3 Tweak maintainer name: Debian EFI team
> > >> 542478d Fix typo in ITP bug#
> > >
> > >Appreciated.  In terms of operational timing now, should I wait until it clears
> > >NEW to build a new fwupd against it?  Or should that happen now?
> >
> > Until it's cleared NEW it's not in the archive at all, so there's no
> > point at all - the new fwupd will then be totally blocked. I'm hoping
> > ftpmaster will be kind to us and get us out of NEW quickly...
> >
> 
> Right, at least in Ubuntu-land that's OK, it just stays blocked in proposed until it can
> build.  It also ends up putting pressure on AA to review/release the thing in NEW for
> it.  Wasn't sure if that's appropriate in Debian and why I was asking.
> 
> I'll get the packaging ready in the debian-next branch and it should hopefully just be
> a matter of pulling the trigger when released from NEW.

Just uploaded fwupd 1.2.4-1.  One remaining question though; I still haven't seen the
signed packages (Eg fwupd-amd64-signed and friends) go through for the EFI binary.

Is that a manual process at the moment, or just a cron that hasn't hit?

Thanks!


Reply to: