RE: Processed: severity of 912414 is important

To: <owner@bugs.debian.org>, <kurt@roeckx.be>
Cc: <debian-efi@lists.debian.org>
Subject: RE: Processed: severity of 912414 is important
From: <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:08:38 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 8034e0e951e74912ac23d1fc167c7f32@ausx13mpc120.AMER.DELL.COM>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.s.C.154186153810498.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <20181110145214.0A1A31FE0AAC@intrepid.roeckx.be> <[🔎] handler.s.C.154186153810498.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

Can someone affected by this please confirm if fwupd actually works properly for updates with that one change?
Lots has changed with fwupd and LVFS, so I am wondering if LVFS has changed in any other incompatible ways since then.

Reply to:

References:
- Processed: severity of 912414 is important
  - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: severity of 912414 is important
Next by Date: Re: Where are we with SB? What's missing?
Previous by thread: Processed: severity of 912414 is important
Next by thread: Re: Where are we with SB? What's missing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread