<Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> writes: > Now this is the weird part. Why is gcc reporting it's supported? Good question. Granted, the options it checks and uses are slightly different, but the one it checks is literally "strong"er. At any rate, thanks for taking a look! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu