Re: UEFI Secure Boot - the plan for stretch
- To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>, debian-efi@lists.debian.org, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, micah anderson <micah@debian.org>, Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>, pabs@debian.org, lfaraone@debian.org, debian-admin@lists.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org
- Subject: Re: UEFI Secure Boot - the plan for stretch
- From: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:25:49 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 5703F51D.6080205@dell.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20160405034925.GC14894@virgil.dodds.net>
- References: <[🔎] 20160401133517.GC31407@einval.com> <[🔎] 1459823761.23351.27.camel@decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 20160405034925.GC14894@virgil.dodds.net>
On 04/04/2016 10:49 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:36:01AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> * fwupdate
>> Someone who understands this should open an ITP or RFP.
> fwupdate just needs a fwupdate-signed package for any EFI-signed binary if
> we want this to be usable on secureboot systems. I wouldn't say this blocks
> SB support though and would leave it up to the fwupdate maintainers (incl.
> Sledge) to sort through.
I've filed #820124 for tracking this. It has the same infrastructure
blockers as grub2 and should be resolvable at about the same time.
Reply to: