|
On 10/05/2015 03:07 PM, Dominguez,
Jared wrote:
Yes, I understand it's an issue for when it needs to be re-signed by MS to work with secure boot. An unsigned or self-signed are functionally equivalent in a non-secure boot situation.On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:03:15PM -0500, Limonciello, Mario wrote:Hello, I'd like to get an fwupdate update sponsored into unstable. It's been staged in git (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/uefi/fwupdate.git). fwupdate (0.4-5) unstable; urgency=medium [ Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre ] * debian/patches/do-not-pesign: don't self-sign EFI binaries. * debian/control: dropped Build-Depends on pesign. [ Mario Limonciello ] * Backport 1c7f78 and 1c1218 to avoid errors if SHIM_DEBUG is missing. * Add myself to uploaders. -- Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com> Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:43:51 -0500Looks fine by me, though is self-signing the binary actually causing problems? --Jared --
Mario Limonciello Dell | Client Software Group |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature