[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: UCS School (Link to German page)



Hi,

> I've just read this article about UCS@school
> 
>     http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/23680/ucsschool-41-r2-freigegeben.html
> 
> Is there any relation to Debian Edu work and if not why not or should we
> cooperate to some extend?

We are running UCS at work and the answer is:

Yes, UCS is in some way related to Debian Edu, or, better put, to GoSA. But 
only because both partially do the same thing.

No, UCS is not related to Debian (Edu) from a technical point of view. UCS is 
based on an old Ubuntu version with partially quite crippled proprietary 
packages.

I have worked with UCS for some years and also with GoSA², and have found only 
few things UCS can do better than GoSA. One of these things are LDAP triggers 
- UCS can trigger arbitrary scripts on defined LDAP changes, coming in handy 
at times when data from LDAP needs to be synchronised in some way, e.g. 
running ldap2bind.

But these things that UCS can do better are non-free, proprietary additions 
which we should probably re-implement. I have already started work on the 
trigger thing some time ago (it is not as simple as it sounds).

One interesting thing would be to enable Debian Edu clients to run in a UCS 
environment. Personally, I do not think supporting a proprietary server 
product is worth the effort (do we support Debian Edu clients running in a 
Windows server environment?), but that would be one point where I see 
possibilities for cooperation.

Personally, I think we should rather strive to make GoSA keep up with UCS.

-nik

-- 
PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17  FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296

Dominik George · Mobil: +49-1520-1981389

Teckids e.V. · FrOSCon e.V. · OpenRheinRuhr e.V.
Fellowship of the FSFE · Piratenpartei Deutschland
Opencaching Deutschland e.V. · Debian Contributor

LPIC-3 Linux Enterprise Professional (Security)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: