[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#648219: killer script does not recognize X2Go sessions



Hi Petter,

On Sa 29 Jun 2013 20:44:53 CEST Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:


Hi, Mike.

Can you tell me how x2go users show up in consolekit?  Try to run
ck-list-sessions after loggin in, and let me know what it shows.

The two sessions below depict a running session (one SSH session and on top of that an nx-X11 session).

Session700:
	unix-user = '1000'
	realname = 'Mike Gabriel'
	seat = 'Seat87'
	session-type = ''
	active = FALSE
	x11-display = ''
	x11-display-device = ''
	display-device = '/dev/ssh'
	remote-host-name = 'localhost.localdomain'
	is-local = FALSE
	on-since = '2013-06-30T11:32:42.831202Z'
	login-session-id = '4294967295'
Session701:
	unix-user = '1000'
	realname = 'Mike Gabriel'
	seat = 'Seat88'
	session-type = ''
	active = FALSE
	x11-display = ':51'
	x11-display-device = ''
	display-device = ''
	remote-host-name = ''
	is-local = TRUE
	on-since = '2013-06-30T11:32:48.243293Z'
	login-session-id = '4294967295'

And this is a suspended session:

Session701:
        unix-user = '1000'
        realname = 'Mike Gabriel'
        seat = 'Seat88'
        session-type = ''
        active = FALSE
        x11-display = ':51'
        x11-display-device = ''
        display-device = ''
        remote-host-name = ''
        is-local = TRUE
        on-since = '2013-06-30T11:32:48.243293Z'
        login-session-id = '4294967295'

I get the impression that we (X2Go upstream) should do something to notify consolekit of session status updates.

Do you know any hints / readers that we can study so that consolekit support gets incorporated into X2Go?

Greets,
Mike




--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb

Attachment: pgparFR8gAMyP.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift


Reply to: