Hi Giorgio, On Sa 19 Jan 2013 12:21:14 CET Giorgio Pioda wrote:
Please send me the translation file, then... Obtain the .pot file from here: https://oss.gonicus.de/repositories/gosa-contrib/netgroups/as I said, I first have to consider in which direction to go for next school year 2013/2014
How about this goal: deploy Debian Edu wheezy. ;-)
Send the file back to this list and I will commit the translation. >What about release timings? I really need kernel >= 3 for my 10 >starboard whiteboards (I'm using the russian GPL'ized lsadrv >module). Is linux-image 3.2.x from squeeze-backports an option? We stuff up our squeeze installation with packages from squeeze-backports which works fine.I tested once the Kenji Muto .iso but only on pupil laptops. I dropped the experience in favour of Ubuntu 12.04 (brand new hardware combined with unskilled hands on). I should test it. Anyway, since years I'm used to do most of things on "testing" which normally is pretty stable.
During a freeze phase in Debian, I fully agree. During non-freeze stages (e.g. while multiarch was introduced lately) I must say, I fully disagree...
I don't understand why the debian-edu development is not keptup to date on testing, thus having a release timing synced with main debian release.
This mostly due do lack of continuous man power. Those people who are working on Debian Edu are doing great. However, all of us have loads of fields of endeavour, so noone from the dev team can contribute 100% time to Debian Edu. :-(
>My "non eduified" educational lan is already migrating to wheezy >in these days. I also >admit that debian-lan is also actracting me, because of flexibility. My secret dream is to use Debian LAN for D-E jessie. But for that, we indeed have to push out D-E wheezy shortly after the official Debian wheezy release. MikeMerging the effort would be great. I also think this, and yes, for D-E jessie the devel, please, in sync with jessie itself.
:-) So hop onboard, with each active developer, this becomes more likely.
In my wishlist I would also like to see Cfengine3 deeper boundled; im currently using it since November to keep the client in sync and is really great to automatize additional packagesand configs.
Yes, I have also had several deployed setups (not any more) that were fully maintained by Cfengine3. However, if a switch over to Debian LAN will be in the discussion, one should see what can be handled by FAI and if then is anything left that has to be handled by cfengine.
Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
Attachment:
pgpqSVvlZzFC7.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift