Subject: Do Patrick Winnertz repect the work of others?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear List,
after I spend time of adding information about CipUX requested by
our project members, I found that this information is deleted
(revoked) yesterday by Patrik Winnertz. FinnArne Johansen and Nigel
Barker are also affected by this:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/AdminToolForEtch
As you can read in the changelog of that page.
We need a good comparison of both admin approaches. And I think,
if there is someone who feels that it is too much information
we can make a second page to simplify.
Patrik Winnertz do you really think it will make
lwat look better if you delete the CipUX information on that page?
Patrick, I request that you revoke that deletion to revision 26
and readd content of upper revisions.
Otherwise it make not sense to contribute to that page.
Greetings
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF/QPfrKb2iXSP9HYRAuaoAKDELJXY2pVDaPohJKXSuj54uke7SQCeIelq
oTtZ4u2eDW1diFkyFI2JODc=
=yKGx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: