Documentation for Debian-edu and license (was: [Debian Wiki] Update of "DebianEdu/CipUX/License" by ChristianKuelker)
- To: Christian Kuelker <christian.kuelker@cipworx.org>
- Cc: Debian Edu Mailinglist <debian-edu@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Documentation for Debian-edu and license (was: [Debian Wiki] Update of "DebianEdu/CipUX/License" by ChristianKuelker)
- From: Finn-Arne Johansen <faj@bzz.no>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:25:44 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 44475398.4080000@bzz.no>
- In-reply-to: <20060420091357.GA19408@saruman.uio.no>
- References: <20060419231643.8766.52132@spohr.debian.org> <4447129A.9050300@bzz.no> <20060420085124.GP4872@cbob.cipworx.org> <20060420091357.GA19408@saruman.uio.no>
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Christian Kuelker]
>
>>The Documentation of CipUX is GFDL with no invariant sections.
(see http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/CipUX)
>>
>>You can change that too.
>
>
> Actually, only the author of a text can legally change its license.
>
>
>>You should know it, the GFDL with no invariant sections should
>>comply the DFSG. If the DFSG will change its mind then we could
>>change the license.
>
>
> Yes. But it is not possible to cut-n-paste between GPL- and
> GFDL-licensed content, and that make it hard to share text between GPL
> programs and GFDL documentation. What about licensing the
> documentation using GPL? That is my recommendation, at least.
And I wont edit the documentation written by someone else, and releases
as GFDL.
So please change the License to GPL.
Lets move the discussion to debian-edu, to get more people aware of this.
--
Finn-Arne Johansen
faj@bzz.no http://bzz.no/
Debian-edu developer and Solution provider
EE2A71C6403A3D191FCDC043006F1215062E6642 062E6642
Reply to: