Hi Colin, thank you for your quick reply! Quoting Colin Watson (2022-06-13 12:27:59) > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:27:07AM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > > I reassigned bug #1012622 to base-passwd, in order to make constant the > > group id for crontab. I believe that the arguments provided by Johannes > > Schauer Marin Rodrigues are strong enough to propose a change. > > I'm afraid I am not very convinced by this line of argument; it seems > very weak and circumstantial. It leaves us in a position where every > package with a user or group that might conceivably end up owning files > in a system image will want to have a static ID, and there will be no > particularly good way to draw distinctions between which ones should and > which ones shouldn't. The space of available static IDs is large > (60000-64999), but not infinite; I would much rather push back on this > proposal since otherwise there will be no incentive to come up with a more > reasonably-scalable approach. > > The cases where I allocate static IDs at present are typically those > where it's important for interoperability that they be the same on all > systems, often situations involving networked filesystems and such. > > > > Excellent question! So in general, it would be great if there was a declarative > > > way to allocate user and group ids at installation time, so that different > > > installation ordering by apt would not lead to different user and group ids. > > > Alas, we do not have such a mechanism and talking with developers of apt and > > > dpkg revealed no easy way to create it. > > Why would this be a matter for apt/dpkg, rather than for adduser? Yes, > there have been various conversations about doing declarative user/group > creation in dpkg, but at present dynamic system users/groups are created > by adduser. > > Couldn't we fairly easily add a configuration file that adduser would > read with preseeded user/group IDs for various names, and have it > preferentially use those IDs if available rather than picking > arbitrarily from the relevant ID namespace? This certainly seems a lot > easier than adding declarative user/group creation to dpkg. I did not consider this way of solving this problem yet. Partly, because I'd like to remove the adduser dependency from the apt maintainer script to create the _apt user -- see #969631. So you propose to introduce another registry of uid/gid <-> user/group mappings but not maintained by the base-passwd package but by the adduser package? I guess this should use the range 100-999, right? Adding support for default uid/gid numbers to adduser would probably a "quick fix" but I wonder whether this is the approach we want to use in the long term. Since there is also https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/Spec/SysUser I'm adding debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org to the CC. Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature