[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#888243: Bug#888549: chrome-gnome-shell: Please don't use /etc/opt, it's not FHS-compliant

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:47:16PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:41:49PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:28:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > Can we reassing this already, please?
> > 
> > for those watching along:
> > - #93390 is closed.
> > - #888549 is assigned to chrome-gnome-shell
> I was referring to #888243, which is not a bug in base-files.

thanks for pointing this out. I guess this is because we are cc:ing #888549 
and #888546 here, and #888546 is merged with #888243, #888549 is not merged
with anything.


- #888243/#888546 is assigned to base-files and in 888243 is called " Lack of /opt in
  base-files causes piuparts issues for in-house packages" while 888546
  is called "gnome-chrom-shell: After purging files have disappeared:
  /etc/opt/ owned by: chrome-gnome-shell"
- #888549 is assigned to gnome-chrome-shell and is called
  "chrome-gnome-shell: Please don't use /etc/opt, it's not

So it seems to me, that 

a.) using /opt/etc and shipping files there is fine today and piuparts
    should not complain here
b.) thus #888243/#888546 should be reassigned to piuparts
c.) #888549 should be closed or merged with #888243/#888546

Am I missing something?

on a related note, why do merged bugs have different titles?


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: