Re: PATCH: dpkg: allow missing /etc/dpkg/dpkg.d directory
Anders Oleson writes ("Re: PATCH: dpkg: allow missing /etc/dpkg/dpkg.d directory"):
> But they expressed a desire to upstream patches (in general), so I
> thought I'd see what you thought. If don't-care/don't fail was acceptable,
> then why not start the discussion there.
I wanted to reply to this. I absolutely encourage you to come and try
to upstream your patches. You will get the benefit of our orneriness
about error handling :-). By which I meank people like me can give
you advice on how to solve your practical problems in a more robust
And we will hopefully get the benefit of your code contribution.
Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.