[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #365



Hi,

* Guillem Jover [Sat Aug 01, 2015 at 12:54:13AM +0200]:
> On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 00:30:00 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

> > But the binary package build fails inside cowbuilder (sid):

> > | 00:04:10 Depends: debhelper (>= 9), pkg-config, flex, gettext (>= 0.19), po4a (>= 0.41), zlib1g-dev, libbz2-dev, liblzma-dev, libselinux1-dev (>= 1.28-4), libncursesw5-dev, libio-string-perl <!nocheck>
> > | 00:04:10 dpkg-deb: error: parsing file '/tmp/satisfydepends-aptitude/pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy/DEBIAN/control' near line 8 package 'pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy':
> > | 00:04:10  'Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package 'libio-string-perl'
> > | 00:04:10 E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.

> >  -- https://jenkins.grml.org/job/dpkg-binaries/architecture=amd64/318/console

> > So I guess we need the workaround until dpkg of unstable can handle
> > that? :)

> The problem is in pbuilder, the version supporting build-profiles was
> just NMUed recently in unstable (#740577 0.215+nmu4). :/

Ah, I wasn't aware of that yet - thanks for the hint.

> So the options could be:

>  * backport that pbuilder version to jessie and install that.

That seems like the best option, I just installed pbuilder from
unstable on jenkins.grml.org and triggered a new dpkg build:

  https://jenkins.grml.org/job/dpkg-binaries/

Seems to work fine now (still running, but the relevant step has
passed already for the i386 build).

>  * switch to sbuild which should have build-profiles support in jessie,
>    (which might be undesirable or too much work, but then pbuilder
>    seems pretty much unmaintained nowadays, barring NMUs :).
[...]

Supporting sbuild in jenkins-debian-glue sadly doesn't seem to be so
easy. :( I'd be happy to discuss this in my j-d-g BoF at Debconf
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/285/jenkins-debian-glue-bof/
though and would *love* to have you - Guillem - attend it.

regards,
-mika-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: