On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Thanks for doing the rebuilds!
> * Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>, 2014-02-18, 22:58:
> >┌────────────┬────────────┬───────┐
> >│ current │ buildarch │ count │
> >├────────────┼────────────┼───────┤
> >│ attempted │ attempted │ 317 │
> >│ attempted │ successful │ 26 │
> >│ failed │ failed │ 35 │
> >│ failed │ successful │ 3 │
> >│ successful │ attempted │ 1483 │
> >│ successful │ failed │ 3 │
> >│ successful │ successful │ 8650 │
> >└────────────┴────────────┴───────┘
> >Raw data:
> >http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/rebuild-buildarch-20140218.sql.xz
> Do I understand correctly that your rebuilds were with -B, and
> therefore packages that build only arch:all package were not tested
> at all?
> It would be interesting to see how packages that builds arch:all
> packages behave when rebuilt with -A.
> >I hope the above is useful for measuring progress on this front.
> >Do we have any plans for enforcing build-arch for jessie at this
> >point? If we haven't already, stronger warnings when running
> >dpkg-buildpackage and stronger lintian warnings (errors?) would be
> >useful to add.
>
> If build-{arch,indep} is missing, Lintian currently emits
> debian-rules-missing-recommended-target[0]. I think we should go
> ahead and make it emit debian-rules-missing-required-target[1],
> which is on ftp-masters' auto-reject list.
> I attached dd-list of packages that were is non-successful state in
> the "buildarch" rebuild. Packages marked with "*" were also in
> non-successful state in the "current" build.
> [0] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-rules-missing-recommended-target.html
> [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-rules-missing-required-target.html
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
> * openldap (U)
> samba (U)
This is not useful without build logs. Both of these packages use dh(1),
which is perfectly build-arch-compatible; there's bug #738641 reported on
openldap about the libdb5.1 transition, but that doesn't actually cause a
build failure yet.
So I think this build environment is suspect, and such a summary report is
not useful without substantial details.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature