On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:58:50PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > I hope the above is useful for measuring progress on this front. Do > we have any plans for enforcing build-arch for jessie at this point? > If we haven't already, stronger warnings when running dpkg-buildpackage > and stronger lintian warnings (errors?) would be useful to add. I should have added here, if any additional information would be helpful, I have all the build logs on hand for the moment, and can obtain any additional information if needed. And if any additional testing needs doing, e.g with different dpkg patches, I can repeat the exercise given a little notice. The testing was done on an 8-core 4GHz AMD FX-8350 system with 16GiB RAM and a 200GiB btrfs volume for the build snapshots, with the Debian archive mirror and build products accessed and stored, respectively, using NFSv4 with a FreeBSD 10.0 ZFS fileserver. Each run took just over 2.5 days, using GNU parallel to drive 8 concurrent sbuild/schroot builds; a little more optimisation could reduce this time further. The system is quite thoroughly burned in now; it made a nice "cooking electronics" smell for the first hour, and other than that went smoothly until Btrfs toasted itself with lots of kernel BUGs when it unbalanced itself to the point of unusability after 5 days of being thrashed mercilessly, around build 19500; a btrfs filesystem rebalance made it go again--but something to watch out for if you're a btrfs user! (Glad I'm no longer using it except for build snapshots! Using a filesystem shouldn't reduce your system to requiring a hard reset! At least it was recoverable this time…) Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature