Re: Declarative Diversions - Report 1
On 2011-06-03, Sam Dunne <gmail@sam.33mail.com> wrote:
> -----------------------
> Details - 'dpkg-divert'
> -----------------------
> When we impliment the new diversion method we should keep the current
> dpkg-divert. This allows maintainers to catch up with the new method
> without
> breaking their packages. It also allows maintainers to perform some
> operations
> that aren't support by the new method.
And whattabout sysadmins usages of dpkg-divert ?
/Sune
Reply to: